LANGUAGE IN INDIA

Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow

Volume 25:12 December 2025
ISSN 1930-2940

Editors:
         Selvi M. Bunce, M.A., Ph.D. Candidate
         Nathan Mulder Bunce, M.A., Ph.D.
         Sam Mohanlal, Ph.D.
         B. Mallikarjun, Ph.D.
         A. R. Fatihi, Ph.D.
         G. Baskaran, Ph.D.
         T. Deivasigamani, Ph.D.
         Pammi Pavan Kumar, Ph.D.
         Soibam Rebika Devi, M.Sc., Ph.D.

Honorary Managing Editor & Publisher: M. S. Thirumalai, Ph.D.

Celebrate India!
Unity in Diversity!!


HOME PAGE

Click Here for Back Issues of Language in India - From 2001

Poetic Encounter
Available in https://www.amazon.in/dp/B09TT86S4T

Poems
Naked: the honest browsings of two brown women
Available in https://www.amazon.in

Decrees
Available in https://www.amazon.com




BOOKS FOR YOU TO READ AND DOWNLOAD FREE!


REFERENCE MATERIALS

BACK ISSUES


  • E-mail your articles and book-length reports in Microsoft Word to languageinindiaUSA@gmail.com.
  • PLEASE READ THE GUIDELINES GIVEN IN HOME PAGE IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE LIST OF CONTENTS.
  • Your articles and book-length reports should be written following the APA, MLA, LSA, or IJDL Stylesheet.
  • The Editorial Board has the right to accept, reject, or suggest modifications to the articles submitted for publication, and to make suitable stylistic adjustments. High quality, academic integrity, ethics and morals are expected from the authors and discussants.

Copyright © 2025
M. S. Thirumalai

Publisher: M. S. Thirumalai, Ph.D.
11249 Oregon Circle
Bloomington, MN 55438
USA


Custom Search

A Typological Study of Adpositions: English Prepositions and Telugu Postpositions

Dr. G. Renuka Devi


Abstract

This article analyses the syntactic distinctions between English prepositions and Telugu postpositions within a syntactic and typological context. The study emphasises structural variations in head-directionality, morphological realisation, genitive placement, stranding and stacking based on descriptive grammars, particularly within the framework of Distributed Morphology and Minimalist Program, typological surveys, and applied linguistic analysis. Instances from both languages demonstrate that English, characterised as a head-initial SVO language, constantly uses prepositions, whereas Telugu, identified as a head-final SOV language, utilises postpositions and relational nouns. The research contextualises these results concerning Greenbergian word-order universals and provides insights into their significance for second language acquisition and the theory of linguistics.

Keywords:prepositions, postpositions, structural variations, typological survey, linguistic analysis

Introduction

Adpositions are crucial indicators of geographical, chronological, and abstract relationships in several languages. They differ in form and function, manifesting as prepositions (preceding their complement) or postpositions (succeeding their complement). The syntactic function and morphological realization of adpositions showcase a significant domain in both typological and structural investigations. Adpositions belong to a universal category, P. There is a significant overlap between the functions of adpositions and morphological cases across languages, suggesting syntactic homogeneity between some cases and adpositions, with their primary contrast lying at the post-syntactic morphological level. Through the lenses of a comprehensive syntactic and typological context, this article thoroughly analyses the adpositions of Telugu and English.

English, a Germanic language, has fundamentally head-initial ordering, which functions within an SVO framework, and it always utilizes prepositions. In this system, the prepositions are typically realised as free-standing and they precede the noun phrases, i.e., P+NP. On the contrary, Telugu, a Central Dravidian language, operates in a head-final system with an SOV structure, employing postpositions and relational nouns, where the postpositions usually follow the nominal phrase, i.e., NP+P. Unlike English, Telugu is heavily inflectional. These fundamental dissimilarities cause syntactic and semantic difficulties for Telugu learners acquiring English.

This research highlights five specific structural differences between English prepositions and Telugu postpositions. Firstly, this study compares the typical head directionality found in both languages. Then it analyses the physical realisations of adpositions, i.e., in English prepositions are separate and independent words, whereas in Telugu, postpositions are often suffixed directly to the nouns or they are blended with case markers. Thirdly, this article investigates the position of the genitive element, relating its placement to the structure of the NP or DP to be more specific. Finally stranding and stacking features of adpositions are analysed. This investigation relies on contemporary theories like Distributed Morphology, Minimalist Program syntax, and draws on information from cross-linguistic surveys and applied linguistic analysis. These structural differences are framed by referencing Greenbergian Word-Order Universals. These frameworks treat adpositions and case markers as the outcome of the spell-out stage of different functional projections of the noun, i.e., P, D, and Ø.


This is only the beginning part of the article. PLEASE CLICK HERE TO READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE IN PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION.


Dr. G. Renuka Devi
Assistant Professor
Department of Linguistics and Contemporary English
The English and Foreign Languages University
Regional Campus, Lucknow

Custom Search


  • Click Here to Go to Creative Writing Section

  • Send your articles
    as an attachment
    to your e-mail to
    languageinindiaUSA@gmail.com.
  • Please ensure that your name, academic degrees, institutional affiliation and institutional address, and your e-mail address are all given in the first page of your article. Also include a declaration that your article or work submitted for publication in LANGUAGE IN INDIA is an original work by you and that you have duly acknowledged the work or works of others you used in writing your articles, etc. Remember that by maintaining academic integrity we not only do the right thing but also help the growth, development and recognition of Indian/South Asian scholarship.